Google Ads
Google Ads hotel account structure: brand, non-brand and remarketing
One account, one campaign, every search type mixed together: the Google Ads report then looks good on paper, but management cannot decide where to increase or reduce the budget.

AI illustration
The Google Ads account structure determines whether you can make budget decisions or just watch total clicks and guess. For a hotel, where brand search, generic destination search and remarketing have a completely different cost and intent, mixing in one campaign is the most common cause of erroneous conclusions at management meetings.
Why the structure of the account is not a technical detail
When all search types are in one campaign:
- brand search masks expensive non-brand performance
- Remarketing is spending a budget that should go into acquisition
- Optimizing for “all conversions” favors cheaper clicks, not better bookings
- management can't answer "how much new demand vs existing brand costs us"
A good structure allows for clear reporting cost per booking per campaign type which is the basis for budget decisions.
Recommended structure for hotel account
Basic division by search intention:
| Campaign | Intention | Example of a query |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | The guest is looking for your hotel | “Adriatic Split” |
| Non-brand generic | Search for accommodation in destination | “hotel split center” |
| Non-brand specific | Search type/package | “spa hotel Istria” |
| Remarketing | Reaching previous website visitors again | Audience from GA4/GTM |
| DSA (optional) | Covering the long tail | Dynamic ads by web content |
Each campaign has its own daily budget or bidding strategy. A more detailed distinction of brand vs non-brand is explained in the article Google Ads brand and non-brand.
Within-campaign structure: ad groups by topic
Within the campaign, ad groups should follow the theme of the search not just one word difference:
Non-brand campaign "Split":
- Ad group: hotel split center
- Ad group: boutique hotel split
- Ad group: hotel split parking
Brand Campaign:
- Ad group: the exact name of the hotel
- Ad group: hotel name + location
- Ad group: hotel name + variants (typos)
Each ad group has its own ads, extensions, and negative keywords that prevent it from overlapping with other groups.
Naming convention that saves reports
Without consistent naming, reports become illegible. Example of convention:
[Type] | [Destination/Market] | [Language] | [Objective]
Examples:
Brand | HR | HR | BookingsNonBrand | Split | DE | BookingsRemarketing | Checkout abandon | HR | Bookings
When management asks “how much we spend on the German market”, the answer must not require manual filtering of 40 campaigns with vague names.
Budget and priorities by campaign type
The order of priority for most hotels:
- Brand - protection of existing demand, usually the lowest cost per booking
- Remarketing - return of guests who have shown interest
- Non-brand - acquisition of new demand, usually the most expensive channel
- DSA/experimental - only when the basic structure is working
Budgets for non-brand campaigns should only grow when booking funnel and tracking work properly. Increasing the non-brand budget to a weak booking engine increases cost per booking without proportional revenue.
Tracking and conversions: the basis of the structure
Account structure makes no sense without proper tracking:
- primary conversion: confirmed booking from booking engine
- secondary: starting a booking, viewing prices (for optimization, not for management report)
- GA4 hotel tracking linked to Google Ads conversion imports
Without this, Smart Bidding optimizes for the wrong signal: often a click on the "Book" button, not a confirmation.
Seasonality and structure
The structure does not change every month, but budgets and campaigns within it do:
- pre-season: more non-brand to generate demand
- peak season: more brand and remarketing, less non-brand
- post-season: remarketing for repeat guests and loyalty
Seasonal budget planning works within the existing structure; it does not require a reorganization of accounts each season.
Common Mistakes in Hotel Accounts
- All in one campaign - inability to decide on a budget
- Too many narrow ad groups - not enough data to optimize
- Brand as broad match without negative keywords - payment for irrelevant queries
- Remarketing without segmentation - spending on all visitors
- Same landing for all ad groups - lower Quality Score and fewer conversions
To diagnose an existing account, hotel audit includes an overview of the structure, tracking, and performance by campaign type.
Conclusion
A good Google Ads account structure for a hotel is not a luxury: it is a prerequisite for rational budget decisions. Brand, non-brand and remarketing have different roles and different costs; an account that does not reflect this generates reports that look good but do not help the revenue team.
To set up or reorganize an account, see Google Ads for hotels.
Related: case study Meneghetti Wine Hotel & Winery. Campaigns, the booking engine and direct booking results, June 2026 vs June 2025, source GA4.
Frequently asked questions
How many campaigns does a Google Ads hotel account need?
There's no fixed number. It is crucial to separate intentions (brand, non-brand, remarketing) so that each campaign has a clear role, budget, and KPI. Too many campaigns without enough data slows down optimization.
Should the brand and non-brand be kept in the same campaign?
We don't recommend it. Brand search has a different purpose, CTR and cost per booking. Mixing makes budget decisions difficult and can mask expensive non-brand performance.
Nikton Hospitality. A digital marketing agency for hotels.
About Nikton Hospitality and how we workRelated articles

Google Ads
Google Ads for hotels: brand vs non-brand campaigns
Brand and non-brand campaigns play different roles in hotel marketing. Here is how to separate them, track them and interpret the results.

Google Ads
Negative keywords in hotel campaigns
How to exclude irrelevant queries without blocking guests who can book: types of matches, level of application and working record of decisions.